He’s here to win. No, not Macca, Lance Armstrong. Like Chris McCormack, Armstrong makes no excuses for his competitive nature and drive to succeed. Whether it’s cycling, kicking cancers ass and now at triathlons, Armstrong is here to win.
He’s made a huge splash by FINALLY making it official about his plans to race Ironman Kona and followed that up by coming in second in his first 70.3 race as a pro triathlete. This after a couple of decades off from the sport as a pro. Not bad.
In all the hubbub, in some corners, triathletes and fans of the sport are questioning the positive or negative impact this will have on the sport of triathlon. No bones about it, Lance has brought A LOT of eyes, ears and TV cameras to the sport in just a week. What’s going to happen if he qualifies for Kona and races? Let’s look at some pros and cons for Armstrong in triathlon.
1. PLUS - He brings more notoriety to the sport. EVERYONE knows who Lance Armstrong is and every got that he was a pro cyclist. A smaller population knows what order you swim, bike and run in a triathlon, or even know what three events make up a triathlon. I bet after this weekend, a LOT more people know what a triathlon is.
2. PUSH - With notoriety comes money. Sponsors and TV deals are sure to follow. It’s good to have funding and more money to go around, but with money come higher stakes and more pressure and a breeding ground for corruption and cheating.
3. PLUS – Livestrong and Armstrong go hand in hand. He’s bringing a monster charity to a new playing field and building a bigger army. You cannot argue that more funds for cancer research is not a good thing.